Category: World Politics
Posted: 06/28/06 17:29, Edited: 06/28/06 17:32
by Dave Mindeman
Iraq Prime Minister Al-Maliki's reconciliation plan has been proposed. Ironicially, it calls for timetabled negotiated withdrawal of American troops. As Russ Feingold articulated on Meet the Press, Maliki's plan is essentially the Democratic Senate proposal which was so harshly dismissed with all sorts of "cut and run" rhetoric.
Newsweek had a summary of the major points as follows:
A timetable for withdrawal of occupation troops from Iraq. Amnesty for all insurgents who attacked U.S. and Iraqi military targets. Release of all security detainees from U.S. and Iraqi prisons. Compensation for victims of coalition military operations. Those sound like the demands of some of the insurgents themselves, and in fact they are. But they're also key clauses of a national reconciliation plan drafted by new Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.....Now, the criticism of the amnesty plan for insurgents that killed Americans (criticism voiced by Democrats), led to some back tracking by Maliki. His most recent statements are a little more murky on that subject. But the agreement would recognize the insurgency of local Sunni militias as a "national resistance to an occupying force". In effect, it will sanction the killing of our soldiers as part of the rules of war. That will be difficult to accept. And there are furthur indications that other factions of the Iraqi government will also have problems signing on to other parts of the agreement.
But the bottom line is that Maliki is using language which the White House been criticizing the Democrats for, relentlessly. Bush is rapidly losing control of the "message". Even the new Iraqi government is beginning to move away from the Bush policy line.
This agreement also requires recognition of the separation of this "national resistance" from the war on terrorism. A slap at the Bush administration concept of this being the premiere "battleground in the war on terror".
Withdrawal of coalition forces would use "condition based" language, but several factions within the government want actual dates to use as benchmarks. Again, another slap in the face of the Bush rhetoric.
As this proposal moves forward it will be interesting to see how well the administration receives this "negotiated way out" from this prime minister.....the leader he had to meet in the dead of night to "look into his eyes" .... the government head he now "believes in" wholeheartedly.